EEB’s HOT TAKEšŸ”„

CASTING A WIDE NET The speech was a whistle-stop tour of the Presidentā€™s Political Guidelines for 2024-2029, directly influenced by the EU Councilā€™s Strategic Agenda and the fact that there was no clear guarantee of VDLs re-election prior to the Plenary. The guidelines are, therefore, quite broad and designed to ensure support from a wide coalition from Greens to ECR. 

While the speech was a diplomatic cookie jar, handing out sweets left, right and centre (literally), the guidelines will drive the mandate of the next EU Commission, so it’s worth paying attention. 

CHAMELEON VDL What is clear, though, is that in the last five years, the President of the EU Commission has gone from a ā€œGreenā€ cheerleader to a ā€œBrownā€ one, with industryā€”not youthā€”the new champions of her narrative and deregulation and simplification high on the agenda. While we can say that the Political Guidelines and re-election reaffirmed her commitment to the EU Green Deal, it is in a weakened state compared to before.  

POLITICAL HIGHLIGHTS: THE EEBā€™S HOT TAKE šŸ”„

A NEW INDUSTRIAL DEAL šŸ­

What she said: ā€œA Clean Industrial Deal in the first 100 days of the mandateā€ 

What it means: Von der Leyen is committed to implementing her previous mandateā€™s flagship Green Deal and plans to introduce a “Clean Industrial Deal” to align European decarbonisation with industrialisation. Her speech reinforced 2030 and 2050 climate targets and proposed a 90% emissions reduction target for 2040. However, her emphasis on competitiveness and business-friendly policies raised eyebrows in the EEB. We will monitor these policies closely to ensure they align with zero pollution and climate neutrality goals and that “simplification” is not used to justify compromises on environmental, health, or worker protection standards. 

A FRIEND TO FARMERS šŸ‘Øā€šŸŒ¾

What she said: ā€œA fair future for farmersā€ 

What it means: Von der Leyen acknowledged farmers’ struggles with unfair incomes and climate challenges but failed to offer sustainable solutions. Instead of reinforcing the Farm to Fork Strategy, she reverted to outdated competitiveness and food security rhetoric, supporting the old income-support approach of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). She ignored the agricultural sector’s environmental and climate impacts, failing to address biodiversity loss, pollution, and unsustainable consumption. Europe must tackle these issues to secure farmers’ livelihoods, food security, and the health of people and the planet. 

REACH (FOR THE STARS) šŸ§«

What she said: ā€œA new chemicals industry package” 

What it means: Business interests are prioritised over people and the planet. Despite the EU Council’s call for action against pollution and the Green Deal’s promise to tackle harmful substances, VDL’s Political Guidelines fall short, failing even to mention the pollution crisis explicitly. To secure a healthier future, the EU must stick to the Green Deal’s objectives, focusing on faster responses to chemical hazards through a reformed REACH framework. Simplifying regulations must deliver higher environmental and social protection alongside business certainty and competitiveness in green innovation.  

A crucial step is a broad ban on non-essential PFAS ‘forever chemicals,’ which have polluted our environment and burdened the public with heavy clean-up costs. Only a comprehensive ban will protect our health and ensure intergenerational fairness. 

MONEY TALKS šŸ’ø

What she said: ā€œA mandate of investmentā€ 

What it means: It’s encouraging that VDL emphasises investment. However, her focus on competitiveness, security and defence raises concerns about where this investment will go. The EU needs a green and social investment package for all Member States, targeting public infrastructure, green policy, social investments, and environmental protection. Investments should not be restricted by economic growth but aim for economic transformation, creating quality jobs, decent incomes, gender justice, and a healthy environment. 

DEFENDING DEMOCRACY āš–ļø

Did she say: A new European Democracy Defence Shield šŸ‘€ 

What it means: VDLā€™s pledges to defend democracy are promising on paper. However, the emphasis is heavily on fighting foreign interference and the digital space. With the shrinking of civic space becoming a graver reality every day, it is essential that the new EU Commission commits to involving citizens and CSOs in policymaking. Europe must empower existing and innovative European democratic structures ā€“ including the media, NGOs, and rights defenders ā€“ with real decision-making power and funding. To her credit, she did make explicit the need to protect civil society and deliberative democracy.

CIRCULAR ECONOMY ā™»ļø

What she said: “A new Circular Economy Pact” 

What it means: The guidelines include a new Circular Economy Act. However, the focus appears limited to waste management and recycling, neglecting crucial aspects such as resource use reduction and measures to curb waste generation at the source.

NATURE šŸŒ³

What she said: Very little on nature  

What it means: Everyone wants to preserve the things we hold dear. But the truth is, with an increasingly unpredictable climate and a natural world in rapid decline, we are seriously jeopardising this ‘quality of life’ many of us have grown accustomed to. To protect it, Europe needs to stay the course and commit to a truly green and social deal, which includes more ambition, investment, implementation and enforcement of commitments. 

PLUS… 

HALLUCINATIONS OF HYDROGEN šŸŒ¬ļø

DEAR EU, WAKE UP! The European Court of Auditors has delivered a demolishing report this week, declaring EU hydrogen targets unrealistic and needing a reality check. Ehem… We’ve been saying this for years! But hearing it from a financial watchdog is major. A number of concerns about the cost, readiness, and environmental impact of hydrogen make it a reckless gamble to bet on it as an ‘easy fix’ for decarbonising Europe. The EU Commission must drastically reduce its targets for 2030. Read our article

CANā€™T BE NEUTRAL This report strikes at the very core of the so-called “technology-neutral” approach to climate policy, echoed by von der Leyen in her speech to the EU Parliament yesterday. Not all options are valid for decarbonising Europe. Investing massive public funds in unproven and costly solutions when viable alternatives exist is simply shooting ourselves in the foot. We need renewable hydrogen, but not to the extent that it distracts us from proven methods to reduce emissions: energy savings, renewables, and electrification! 

AND… 

THE CASE FOR AN EU WEALTH TAX In the face of escalating global climate issues, environmental and cost-of-living crises, and the context of constantly deepening social injustices, EU governments stand at a crossroads. Taxing the EUā€™s richest could help the EU address such systemic injustices and foster a just transition quicker and more effectively. Read our briefing and join the European Citizensā€™ Initiative

JOIN US! šŸ‘„šŸ¤

WORK WITH US: The work continues, and we often seek new colleagues to join our team. Could you be one of them? Check out our current vacancies on our website. At the EEB, we’re committed to equal rights. For four years, we’ve contributed data to the FAIR SHARE monitor, assessing women’s representation across all levels. In 2024, out of 95 organisations, we ranked 17th with a FAIR SHARE Index of 6.61, showing fair representation of women in our staff, management, and board roles.

SIGN IT šŸŒāœØ

JOIN THE FUTURE: The European Pact for the Future sparks hope and courage, creates opportunities, and ensures wellbeing for everyone. It promotes sustainable competitiveness and drives transformative changes for a greener tomorrow. Check out the Pact and sign it if you haven’t already.

FOLLOW US! šŸš€šŸŒŸ

WE KNOW YOU WANT TO: We recently expanded our digital presence to Instagram and TikTok! Give us a follow and donā€™t miss our latest green updates and work at the EU level and beyond.